Screener
EFA vs DBEZ
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.13% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than DBEZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; DBEZ covers europe.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | DBEZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $70M |
| Since | 2001 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 3.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 14.68% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -38.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and DBEZ
Explore further