Screener
EFA vs EMXC
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.07% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EMXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; EMXC covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $22.1B |
| Since | 2001 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 21.14% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and EMXC
Explore further