Screener
EFA vs HDEF
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
Key differences
- HDEF costs 0.23% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than HDEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; HDEF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, HDEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | HDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2001 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 3.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 11.60% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -36.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and HDEF
Explore further