Screener
EFA vs IOO
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.08% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than IOO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; IOO covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $8.5B |
| Since | 2001 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +40.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +16.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and IOO
Explore further