Screener
EFA vs MCHI
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.27% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than MCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; MCHI covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2001 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.16% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and MCHI
Explore further