Skip to content
Screener

EFAA vs AOR

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

EFAA

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$505M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

EFAA is an alternative ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • EFAA is an alternative fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • EFAA follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
  • AOR costs 0.24% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than EFAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EFAAAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$505M$3.6B
Since20242008
Dividend yield8.11%2.47%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionglobal ex us
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+18.6%+17.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.08
Volatility 1Y12.46%8.85%
Max drawdown-11.97%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EFAA and AOR