Skip to content
Screener

EFAA vs AOM

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

EFAA

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$505M

AOM

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$1.8B

Key differences

EFAA is an alternative ETF, while AOM is a mixed asset ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and AOM 0.15%.

  • EFAA is an alternative fund, while AOM is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • EFAA covers global markets excluding the US; AOM covers North America.
  • AOM costs 0.24% less per year.
  • AOM is much larger than EFAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EFAAAOM
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$505M$1.8B
Since20242008
Dividend yield8.11%2.98%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionglobal ex usnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.6%+13.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+10.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.96
Volatility 1Y12.46%6.90%
Max drawdown-11.97%-19.96%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EFAA and AOM