Skip to content
Screener

EFAA vs EFA

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

EFAA

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$505M

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

Key differences

EFAA is an alternative ETF, while EFA is an equity ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and EFA 0.32%.

  • EFAA is an alternative fund, while EFA is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • EFA costs 0.07% less per year.
  • EFA is much larger than EFAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EFAAEFA
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$505M$77.4B
Since20242001
Dividend yield8.11%3.10%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionglobal ex usglobal ex us
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.6%+21.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+17.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.4%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.87
Volatility 1Y12.46%15.64%
Max drawdown-11.97%-34.19%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EFAA and EFA