Screener
EFAA vs GTO
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
EFAA is an alternative ETF, while GTO is a fixed income ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and GTO 0.35%.
- EFAA is an alternative fund, while GTO is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EFAA follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- EFAA covers global markets excluding the US; GTO covers North America.
- GTO is much larger than EFAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.6% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.46% | 3.41% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -20.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.