Screener
EFAA vs IWMI
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Key differences
Both EFAA and IWMI are alternative ETFs. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and IWMI 0.68%. The main difference: EFAA follows a index tracking strategy; IWMI uses option income.
- EFAA follows a index tracking strategy; IWMI uses option income.
- EFAA covers global markets excluding the US; IWMI covers North America.
- EFAA costs 0.29% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $909M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +30.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.19% | 15.15% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -23.88% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.