Screener
EFAA vs PGX
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
EFAA is an alternative ETF, while PGX is a fixed income ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and PGX 0.50%.
- EFAA is an alternative fund, while PGX is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EFAA follows a option income strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- EFAA costs 0.11% less per year.
- PGX is much larger than EFAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 6.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.12% | 6.10% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -34.10% |
Similar to EFAA and PGX
Explore further