Screener
EFAA vs PGF
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
EFAA is an alternative ETF, while PGF is a fixed income ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and PGF 0.55%.
- EFAA is an alternative fund, while PGF is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EFAA follows a option income strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- EFAA costs 0.16% less per year.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $699M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 6.29% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.3% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.12% | 6.26% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -28.92% |
Similar to EFAA and PGF
Explore further