Screener
EFAD vs BIDD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares International Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- EFAD costs 0.09% less per year.
- BIDD is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAD follows a index tracking strategy; BIDD uses active selection.
- BIDD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | BIDD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $438M |
| Since | 2014 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -15.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and BIDD
Explore further