Screener
EFAD vs IGRO
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.35% less per year.
- IGRO is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | IGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2014 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -36.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and IGRO
Explore further