Screener
EFAD vs EMDV
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- EFAD costs 0.10% less per year.
- EFAD is significantly larger than EMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | EMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $7M |
| Since | 2014 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 11.05% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -39.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and EMDV
Explore further