Screener
EFAD vs SDY
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
Key differences
- SDY costs 0.15% less per year.
- SDY is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SDY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SDY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | SDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $22.0B |
| Since | 2014 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 10.48% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -36.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and SDY
Explore further