Screener
EFAD vs DWX
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DWX is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAD is classified as equity, while DWX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, DWX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | DWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $512M |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 4.18% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -36.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and DWX
Explore further