Screener
EFAD vs SMDV
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- SMDV costs 0.10% less per year.
- SMDV is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $661M |
| Since | 2014 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 15.90% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and SMDV
Explore further