Screener
EFAD vs TMDV
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- TMDV costs 0.15% less per year.
- EFAD is significantly larger than TMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $4M |
| Since | 2014 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -33.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and TMDV
Explore further