Screener
EFAS vs DIVB
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs iShares Core Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.50% less per year.
- DIVB is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS covers global markets; DIVB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | DIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 11.34% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -36.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and DIVB
Explore further