Screener
EFAS vs HDV
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs iShares Core High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- HDV costs 0.47% less per year.
- HDV is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS covers global markets; HDV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | HDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -37.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and HDV
Explore further