Screener
EFAS vs DIVZ
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- EFAS costs 0.10% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS covers global markets; DIVZ covers north america.
- EFAS follows a index tracking strategy; DIVZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $242M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and DIVZ
Explore further