Screener
EFAS vs IDVZ
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- EFAS costs 0.20% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
- EFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $155M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and IDVZ
Explore further