Screener
EFFE vs RNEM
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF vs First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
Key differences
- EFFE costs 0.07% less per year.
- EFFE is significantly larger than RNEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFFE follows a active selection strategy; RNEM uses index tracking.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFFE | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $130M | $17M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.37% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -13.75% | -38.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFFE and RNEM
Explore further