Screener
RNEM vs EMES
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- EMES costs 0.11% less per year.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNEM | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $11M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 20.51% |
| Max drawdown | -38.37% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNEM and EMES
Explore further