Screener
EFFI vs EMES
Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- EFFI costs 0.10% less per year.
- EFFI is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFFI follows a active selection strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFFI | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $11M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 20.51% |
| Max drawdown | -10.55% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFFI and EMES
Explore further