Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EFO vs EWV

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

EFO

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$30M

EWV

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$7M

Key differences

  • EFO is significantly larger than EWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFO covers europe markets; EWV covers asia pacific.
  • EFO follows a leveraged strategy; EWV uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, EFO has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EFOEWV
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$30M$7M
Since20092007
Dividend yield1.58%4.50%
Asset classequityequity
Regioneuropeasia pacific
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y+39.8%-44.1%
CAGR 3Y+22.7%-28.5%
CAGR 5Y+9.0%-18.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.71-0.79
Volatility 1Y30.85%40.44%
Max drawdown-63.52%-90.00%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EFO and EWV