Screener
EFO vs EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
Key differences
- EFO costs 0.22% less per year.
- EFO covers europe markets; EZJ covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFO | EZJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $13M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | asia pacific |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.85% | 40.31% |
| Max drawdown | -63.52% | -58.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFO and EZJ
Explore further