Screener
EFRA vs EGUS
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
Key differences
- EGUS costs 0.29% less per year.
- EGUS is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFRA covers global markets; EGUS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFRA | EGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $26M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.09% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -24.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFRA and EGUS
Explore further