Screener
EFRA vs USXF
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- USXF costs 0.37% less per year.
- USXF is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFRA covers global markets; USXF covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, USXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFRA | USXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.09% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -29.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFRA and USXF
Explore further