Screener
EFRA vs EMXF
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
Key differences
- EMXF costs 0.31% less per year.
- EMXF is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFRA covers global markets; EMXF covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFRA | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $148M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 3.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFRA and EMXF
Explore further