Screener
EFRA vs ESGD
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- ESGD costs 0.27% less per year.
- ESGD is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFRA covers global markets; ESGD covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, ESGD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ESGD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFRA | ESGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $11.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 3.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -33.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFRA and ESGD
Explore further