Screener
EFU vs BITI
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE vs ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- EFU costs 0.06% less per year.
- BITI is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFU is classified as equity, while BITI is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EFU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFU | BITI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.9M | $187M |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 9.25% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.6% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -23.4% | -37.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.82 | -0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 31.13% | 43.05% |
| Max drawdown | -90.41% | -92.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFU and BITI
Explore further