Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EFU vs ETHT

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE vs Proshares Ultra Ether ETF

EFU

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$0.9M

ETHT

Proshares Ultra Ether ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.94%

Fund size

$250M

Key differences

  • ETHT is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFU is classified as equity, while ETHT is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
  • EFU follows a inverse strategy; ETHT uses leveraged.
  • EFU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EFUETHT
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.94%
Fund size (AUM)$0.9M$250M
Since20072024
Dividend yield5.18%10.41%
Asset classequitycryptocurrency
Regionglobal ex us
Strategyinverseleveraged
CAGR 1Y-32.6%-67.7%
CAGR 3Y-23.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y-16.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y-0.82N/A
Volatility 1Y31.13%136.35%
Max drawdown-90.41%-93.10%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EFU and ETHT