Screener
EFU vs EZJ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
Key differences
- EFU costs 0.22% less per year.
- EZJ is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFU covers global ex us markets; EZJ covers asia pacific.
- EFU follows a inverse strategy; EZJ uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFU | EZJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.9M | $13M |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | asia pacific |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.6% | +57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -23.4% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.5% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.82 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 31.13% | 40.31% |
| Max drawdown | -90.41% | -58.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFU and EZJ
Explore further