Screener
EZJ vs EFZ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EFZ costs 0.22% less per year.
- EZJ covers asia pacific markets; EFZ covers global ex us.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; EFZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | EFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $16M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | -15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and EFZ
Explore further