Screener
EFV vs QEFA
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF vs State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
Key differences
- EFV is significantly larger than QEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFV | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30.0B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2005 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.83% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.25% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -43.16% | -31.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFV and QEFA
Explore further