Screener
QEFA vs EFAV
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- EFAV costs 0.10% less per year.
- EFAV is significantly larger than QEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QEFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QEFA | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $5.4B |
| Since | 2014 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.83% | 10.37% |
| Max drawdown | -31.71% | -27.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QEFA and EFAV
Explore further