Screener
EFZ vs EET
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EET is significantly larger than EFZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFZ covers global ex us markets; EET covers emerging markets.
- EFZ follows a inverse strategy; EET uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFZ | EET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $48M |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.6% | +107.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -9.5% | +37.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.2% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.79 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.44% | 39.49% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -69.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFZ and EET
Explore further