Screener
EFZ vs EFA
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.63% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EFZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFZ follows a inverse strategy; EFA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFZ | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.6% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -9.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.2% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.79 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.44% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFZ and EFA
Explore further