Screener
EFZ vs ULE
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE vs ProShares Ultra Euro
Key differences
- EFZ is classified as equity, while ULE is currency — different risk/return profiles.
- EFZ follows a inverse strategy; ULE uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, ULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFZ | ULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $6M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | currency |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.6% | +2.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -9.5% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.2% | -3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.79 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.44% | 13.75% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -51.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFZ and ULE
Explore further