Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ULE vs EFU

ProShares Ultra Euro vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

ULE

ProShares Ultra Euro

ProShares

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$6M

EFU

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$0.9M

Key differences

  • ULE is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ULE is classified as currency, while EFU is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • ULE follows a leveraged strategy; EFU uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, ULE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ULEEFU
Annual cost (TER)0.98%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$6M$0.9M
Since20082007
Dividend yield0.00%5.18%
Asset classcurrencyequity
Regionglobal ex us
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y+2.1%-32.6%
CAGR 3Y+3.9%-23.4%
CAGR 5Y-3.8%-16.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.09-0.82
Volatility 1Y13.75%31.13%
Max drawdown-51.30%-90.41%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ULE and EFU