Screener
EGLE vs QYLD
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Leaders ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- EGLE costs 0.41% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than EGLE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EGLE is classified as equity, while QYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- EGLE follows a index tracking strategy; QYLD uses option income.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EGLE | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $8.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 11.47% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -9.78% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EGLE and QYLD
Explore further