Screener
EGLE vs QYLG
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Leaders ETF vs Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- EGLE costs 0.16% less per year.
- QYLG is significantly larger than EGLE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EGLE is classified as equity, while QYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- EGLE follows a index tracking strategy; QYLG uses option income.
- QYLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EGLE | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $142M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 6.59% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | +34.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 12.31% |
| Max drawdown | -9.78% | -29.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EGLE and QYLG
Explore further