Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EIDO vs EFA

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

EIDO

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$289M

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

Key differences

Both EIDO and EFA are equity ETFs. EIDO charges 0.59% a year and EFA 0.32%. The main difference: EIDO covers emerging markets; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.

  • EIDO covers emerging markets; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
  • EFA costs 0.27% less per year.
  • EFA is much larger than EIDO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EIDOEFA
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$289M$77.4B
Since20102001
Dividend yield5.26%3.10%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsglobal ex us
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-36.9%+18.4%
CAGR 3Y-18.7%+16.8%
CAGR 5Y-9.4%+8.1%
Sharpe 3Y-1.030.86
Volatility 1Y23.22%15.27%
Max drawdown-59.41%-34.19%

Similar to EIDO and EFA