Screener
EINC vs GPZ
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.06% less per year.
- EINC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $245M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | — |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and GPZ
Explore further