Screener
GPZ vs SMOG
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.24% less per year.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $152M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and SMOG
Explore further