Screener
EINC vs HAP
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $316M |
| Since | 2012 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.9% | +47.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.9% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.1% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.59 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and HAP
Explore further