Screener
HAP vs SMOG
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $152M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.8% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and SMOG
Explore further