Screener
EIPX vs MLPD
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- MLPD costs 0.35% less per year.
- EIPX is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EIPX follows a index tracking strategy; MLPD uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| EIPX | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $532M | $29M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.12% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EIPX and MLPD
Explore further